Slender Thread 2
Are Larger Tuition Discounts Increasing Enrollment?

The Slender Thread blogs look at the capacity of current financial resources to survive the oncoming demographic crash. This blog, Slender Thread – 2, looks at the relationship between changes in tuition and these charts also look at the impact of tuition discounts on enrollment. Economics would suggest that a tuition discount is a price discount that brings demand in alignment with supply. In the case of higher education, demand is enrollment and supply encompasses the courses or programs offered by a college.[1] Chart 1 uses a simple formula, (change in FTE /change in tuition discounts) to ascertain the relative effectiveness of tuition discounts on enrollment. The chart shows that small colleges, FTE < 1,000), did not having any success using tuition discounts to increase or to even stabilize enrollment in 2024. The relationship between tuition and discounts at large colleges, FTE >= 1,000 fluctuate from year to year. Large colleges reported a steady decline in the effectiveness of tuition discounts between 2019 and 2021 with rising effectiveness in 2022, but effectiveness slid between 2022 and 2024. Chart 1
  1. The data set includes 44 private colleges from IPEDS for the period 2017 to 2024 that offered a four-year degree subject to these exclusions because they have different business models: seminaries, yeshivas, art and music schools, research colleges, and colleges with missing data. The last year for the data is 2024; This set of colleges was split into two enrollment groups: FTE < 1,000 students and FTE >= 1,000 students. The data was then averaged for the two groups for each variable by year. The first chart has the basic data trend for both sets of private colleges, and the next two charts show the linear and a second-degree polynomial trend, i.e., a quadratic equation.
  The data and linear trends for small colleges in Charts 1 and 2 suggests that tuition discounts are counter-productive in that enrollment is not increasing relative to tuition discounts. In the case of large colleges, the linear trend indicates that tuition discounts are marginally useful in generating positive changes in enrollment. Chart 2 Chart 3 reinforces the comments in Charts 1 and 2, which suggest that tuition discounts are not effective for small colleges. It would be prudent for small colleges to determine whether tuition discounts are providing value to their enrollment strategies. During the demographic crash, many small colleges will find that continuing to increase tuition discounts will reach a point where the flow of cash from tuition for operations expenses be negligible or zero. The last chart, also, indicates that some large colleges should assess their validity of their tuition discount strategy because their polynomial trend is starting to turn negative. If that curve continues downward as the impact of the demographic crash approaches, then large colleges will find themselves in the same position as small colleges because their operational cash flows could dramatically shrink. Both small and large private colleges face some very tough decisions in the near future about the continued use of tuition discounts because discounts have become a presumably reliable strategy to increase revenue without disturbing the flow of cash to reserves. However, this assumption may have lost its usefulness. Chart 3 Editorial Assistance by Jack Corby, Vice-President of Stevens Strategy

Slender Thread 1
FTE Enrollment Trend from 2018 to 2024

Slender Thread – 1

FTE Enrollment Trend from 2018 to 2024

The Slender Thread refers to the sources of financial resources needed by private colleges and universities to survive the upcoming demographic cliff. There will be five Slender Threads in this series. The order is: 1 – Enrollment Trends, 2 – Relationship of Tuition Discounts to Enrollment, 3 – Effect of Changes in Enrollment on Unrestricted Funds, 4 – Change in Total Net Assets, and 5 – Basic Survival Rules for Slender Threads.

This study used IPEDs data from 2017 to 2024 to compute the enrollment to unrestricted net asset ratio for 944 private colleges.[1] This set of colleges was split into two enrollment groups: FTE < 1,000 students and FTE >= 1,0000 students. The data was then averaged for the two groups for each variable by year. The first chart has the basic data trend for both sets of private colleges, and the next two charts show the linear and a second-degree polynomial trend, i.e., a quadratic equation.

Slender – 1 covers the change in FTE enrollment for a set of 944 private colleges that are split into two FTE enrollment groups: FTE < 1000 and FTE >= 1,000. Changes in FTE enrollment is a critical factor for most private institutions because most of their revenue is generated from enrollment.

Chart 1 clearly shows that FTE enrollment in the small college group (FTE< 1,000) started to fall in 2016, then took a small jump in the latter stages of the COVID pandemic. After 2021, changes in FTE enrollment for small colleges resumed their steady decline through 2024 with a slight moderation of the rate between 2023 and 2024.
_______________________________

  1. The data set includes 44 private colleges from IPEDS for the period 2017 to 2024 that offered a four-year degree subject to these exclusions because they have different business models: seminaries, yeshivas, art and music schools, research colleges, and colleges with missing data. The last year for the data is 2024; This set of colleges was split into two enrollment groups: FTE < 1,000 students and FTE >= 1,000 students. The data was then averaged for the two groups for each variable by year. The first chart has the basic data trend for both sets of private colleges, and the next two charts show the linear and a second-degree polynomial trend, i.e., a quadratic equation.

Chart 1

Charts 2 and 3 provide added support that small colleges have had a trying time stemming enrollment decline since 2018 except for the anomaly of 2021. It does not require a complicated analysis to suggest that small colleges will face tremendous pressure to keep their head above water during the impending demographic cliff after 2026. These three enrollment charts clearly show that delaying strategic change could doom the college given that most small colleges are heavily dependent on tuition revenue to survive.

Chart 2

Chart 3

Editorial Assistance by Jack Corby, Vice-President of Stevens Strategy.